CIT Vs. Indian Farmer Fertilizer
Co-operative (Delhi High Court),
I.T.A. No. 542/2012, Date of decision: 03.03.2015
In Supreme
Court in Sandvik Asia Ltd. V. CIT & Ors. (2006) 280
ITR 643, the Court admittedly
was dealing with facts prior
to the insertion of Section 244A. Therefore, it would be inappropriate for this
Court to consider that judgment now as binding authority. More importantly, Sandvik Asia Ltd. (supra) was
explained by the larger Bench i.e. three Judge Bench decision in Gujarat
Fluoro Chemicals
(supra) where the Supreme Court categorically held that the only amount
which an assessee aggrieved by delayed payment can legitimately claim under the
statute is interest and that
“no other interest on such statutory interest”is payable. This ruling, in the
opinion of this Court, rendered by a larger Bench, would have to be followed as
opposed to the ratio in HEG Ltd. (supra) where the Supreme Court had
expressed a contrary opinion by indicating that the interest component towards
the delayed payment of the tax refund would partake of the character of the „amount of due‟ under
Section 244 A. In other words, HEG Ltd. seems to suggest that there
would be dues on bar, refund and delayed interest. Clearly, that view has not
been approved in Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals (supra). It was urged during
the hearing that India Trade Promotion Organisation (supra) has become
final since the evenue‟s appeal was withdrawn. This Court is of the
opinion that such detail notwithstanding, the
law declared in Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals (supra) is
binding and permits no deviation.
In the light of the above decision, it is held
that the impugned order to the extent it directs payment of any sum over and
above interest payable under Section 244A(1) to the assessee, cannot be upheld.
No comments:
Post a Comment